Editor GRR

Testing vials showing phosphate, niitrate and ammonia levels at Anglian Water STW in Grimston, Norfolk

Spot checks reveal phosphate levels below Grimston STW almost double permitted levels

As new data suggests the Environment Agency has failed to monitor water firms in England, spot checks by Gaywood River Revival can reveal that phosphate levels below the Grimston Sewage Treatment Works (STW) are almost double permitted levels.

On Tuesday evening during a period of moderate rainfall (18mm), our testing team recorded phosphate levels of 9.78mg/l for treated water exiting the Anglian Water STW into the Gaywood River above Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) at Sugar Fen, Derby Fen and Leziate Fen.

With the permitted level for phosphates in discharged treated water from the Anglian Water site being a maximum of 5mg/l, the levels were shocking to our water testers who knew they were about to receive bad news when testing vials turned a dark moody blue.

Phosphate readings from Grimston STW in Norfolk
Grimston STW phosphate levels for treated water were almost double those permitted. Level shown is multiplied by 0.3261

Our water testing team also recorded ammonia and nitrate levels of 3.68mg/l and 50ppm respectively and notes that these chemical levels will be overloading the water with nutrients downstream as it meanders towards the SSSis, thereby disrupting the ecosystem of this rare chalk stream.

Levels of rainfall were not exceptional in Grimston on Tuesday evening when spot checks took place outside the Anglian Water facility in Norfolk, so the results are both surprising and disappointing.

However, they do seem to tally up with a story in the Guardian, where the journalist Sandra Laville reveals that 36% of audits on water firms since 2010 are missing. This suggests that many companies, such as Anglian Water, who self-monitor may not be accurately recording how their treatment works are functioning.

Significantly, the report in the Guardian has used FoI data to confirm that 42 audits out of 117 are missing from annual inspections of the nine water and sewerage companies since 2010.

As an independent testing group Gaywood River Revival is keen to ensure all water companies abide by their permits and has passed on its results to the Environment Agency (incident ref: 2187190).

Gaywood River Revival has been documenting the health of the Gaywood River since Autumn 2021 and now conducts regular spot checks of this chalk stream during both dry periods and periods of rainfall at specific points along the river.

As we look to preserve the Gaywood river eosystem for future generations, we are also working hard to change attitudes towards abstraction and dredging, two of the other major issues this rare chalk stream currently faces.


Read about calls to stop chalk stream dredging near Grimston in this report from the BBC.

Spot checks reveal phosphate levels below Grimston STW almost double permitted levels Read More »

This image shows the bare, dredged chalk stream which forms the upper reaches of the River Gaywood in Grimston, Norfolk

Time for the King’s Lynn IDB to rethink its dredging strategy

We’ve been calling for a halt to dredging precious chalk streams like the Gaywood for quite some time. It’s an outdated and barbaric process that has been rightly been referred to as ecocide by those with scientific knowledge of England’s ‘rainforests’.

Yet, on an annual basis, the King’s Lynn Internal Drainage Board (KLIDB) persists with the annual destruction of this stretch of the Gaywood River near Grimston under the pretence that they are protecting King’s Lynn from flooding.

Speaking to Owen Sennitt in the Eastern Daily Press, Dr Sarah Taigel, argues that there is little reason to clear a thriving chalk stream of its vegetation in the channel, whilst removing that on the bank is “the equivalent to habitat annihilation, not just for fish and invertebrates but also water voles – a protected species.”

Russell Biggs, who regularly tests the water quality of the Gaywood River agrees, pointing out that such activity only leads to diffuse pollution and disturbed silt, which ultimately ‘suffocates life in the stream’.

In the photo above you’ll note that the weed – largely water crowfoot in this picture – and all the invertebrates have just been dumped up on the bank and left to die. 

Link to Story in the EDP.


Time for the King’s Lynn IDB to rethink its dredging strategy Read More »

Scroll to Top